翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Canadian Abortion Rights Action League
・ Canadian Academy
・ Canadian Academy of Endodontics
・ Canadian Academy of Engineering
・ Canadian Academy of Health Sciences
・ Canadian Academy of Recording Arts and Sciences
・ Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine
・ Canadian Accredited Independent Schools
・ Canadian Action Party
・ Canadian Action Party candidates, 1997 Canadian federal election
・ Canadian Action Party candidates, 2000 Canadian federal election
・ Canadian Action Party candidates, 2004 Canadian federal election
・ Canadian Action Party candidates, 2006 Canadian federal election
・ Canadian Actors' Equity Association
・ Canadian administrative law
Canadian Admiral Corp v Rediffusion Inc
・ Canadian Advanced Nanospace eXperiment Program
・ Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women
・ Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O'Malley
・ Canadian Aerodrome Baddeck No. 1 and No. 2
・ Canadian Aerodrome Company
・ Canadian Aeronautics and Space Institute
・ Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal
・ Canadian Aeroplanes
・ Canadian Affair
・ Canadian Afghan detainee issue
・ Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
・ Canadian Agreement
・ Canadian Agricultural Hall of Fame
・ Canadian Agricultural Safety Association


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Canadian Admiral Corp v Rediffusion Inc : ウィキペディア英語版
Canadian Admiral Corp v Rediffusion Inc

''Canadian Admiral Corporation Ltd. v. Rediffusion Inc.'', () Ex. CR 382, 20 CPR 75 is a Canadian copyright law decision by the Exchequer Court (a predecessor of the Federal Court of Canada). The Court held that rebroadcasting of public performances by cable companies did not violate any communication rights or public performance rights. There cannot be copyright in telecasting live events because there is insufficient fixation. The result of the case became a major factor in the following growth of the Canadian cable television industry.
==Background==
A football game was broadcast live from the stadium by a set of three cameras directed by a producer in a van just outside the venue. The game was not recorded in any format and was broadcast live to viewers. Canadian Admiral has purchased the rights to the live feed from the game. Rediffusion, a cable company, captured the transmission of the broadcast and sold it to private homes and public show rooms. Canadian Admiral sued for copyright infringement.
The issue was whether Canadian Admiral owned any copyright in the football game.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Canadian Admiral Corp v Rediffusion Inc」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.